Too young to understand politics? No, not young enough.

June 17th, 2008

While NYRA isn’t in the business of generational warfare, we have seen our share of artillery barrages from older generational warriors. So now and then it doesn’t hurt to peak out from our trenches and fire back. A fascinating new study gives us some nice ammo:

Political science professors Richard R. Lau of Rutgers University and David P. Redlawsk of the University of Iowa say voters in their mid-to-late 60s start to lose their grip on evaluating political candidates. In simulated presidential campaigns, Lau and Redlawsk found that older voters both seek out and recall less information about candidates. As a result, seniors have overall lower rates of what Lau and Redlawsk call “correct voting” — a measure they developed to test how well voters select the candidates who share their positions and ideologies.

More details:

The age effects start showing up in the mid-to-late 60s. As people age, two things are happening. One is that they have a harder time processing new information, so they are learning less quickly than they used to. But as people age, they also have more overall knowledge to draw on. This means they have more established intuitive shortcuts, which means they actually need less information to make a good decision because they better know what information to look for in the first place.

For the first 50 years of one’s voting-age life, then, these two forces tend to balance each other out. But increasing reserves of experience can compensate for declining mental sharpness only until about the mid-to-late 60s. After that, the decline picks up steam. By the time voters turn 90, the scholars’ models predict their correct level of voting will be roughly half of what it was when they were 20.

Quite interesting indeed. Yet would anyone remotely suggest to set a maximum voting age? Not bloody likely. Since voting competence exists on a continuum with lower competencies at either end, why does one end get the vote and the other end is completely disenfranchised?

Stop Child Abuse in Residential Programs for Teens Act of 2008

June 12th, 2008
What should be NYRA’s and any other youth advocate’s top priority now is HR 5876 (read full text here) Take action on the Stop Child Abuse in Residential Programs for Teens Act of 2008 here.
Bill could give federal oversight to private clinics for children and would require FDA inspections

In a move that could have implications for D.C.’s troubled special education system, a panel of lawmakers Wednesday passed sweeping legislation that gives federal authorities the right to inspect private children’s clinics and schools.

The bill would require the federal Department of Health and Human Services to inspect therapeutic schools, clinics, camps and ranches every two years and to fine or shut down any outfit that fails minimum standards for safety and care. It passed the House Education and Labor Committee by a vote of 27-16.

Proponents of the measure said it would protect children and their families from fly-by-night operators who promise miracle cures to mentally ill or disabled children and then warehouse the children with little regard to their safety or welfare.

Thousands of D.C. kids have been shipped to camps and clinics all over the country for decades. There have been repeated complaints of abuse and low standards, but as The Examiner has reported, D.C. officials were hardly aware of where the kids were, let alone what was happening to them.

It’s a program that will cost taxpayers nearly $210 million this year.

Tom Kiley, spokesman for health committee Chairman George Miller, D-Calif., told The Examiner that the bill was necessary to keep kids out of harm’s way.

“A number of children from the District, like thousands of children from all over the country, have been sent across state lines to residential programs where physical, sexual and emotional abuse has occurred,” he said in an e-mail. “We want to make sure that kids are safe no matter what state or setting they are in.”

The legislation has encountered resistance from trade associations linked to the lucrative private clinic and camp industry.

Opponents of the bill said it’s an unnecessary layer of government interference imposed on an industry that’s capable of policing itself.

Miller’s bill now moves on to the full House floor for passage.

As the article said, the bill passed committee and is now going to the full House. This bill is absolutely critical for the rights of youth and their health and safety as well. All NYRA members are strongly urged to support this bill. Typically NYRA is in a position where we are arguing for rights, equality and freedom against those who are too willing to strip away freedom and equality for the idea of health & safety.

This issue however is one of the rare ones where such interests align. Moreover the issue of abuse in teen residential treatment centers shows quite clearly that denying equal rights to youth does not keep them safe but instead exposes them to more danger, more harm, and more risk. These programs generally paid for by parents who just “want what’s best for their kids” are rife with physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse and mental abuse of all kinds.

It makes me sick to think that when the country is paranoid about sexual predators lying in wait for our children on MySpace there are dozens and dozens of well documented cases of sexual abuse and much worse at these camps that doesn’t get near that level of public fear and panic. Why? Why does the media focus all their fear mongering on “stranger-danger” and the Internet instead of on real threats like Tranquility Bay, Peninsula Village, Ivy Ridge and all the rest.

I can think of only two reasons: ignorance and control.

It is plausible, and for some time I assumed this was the chief reason, that most in the mainstream media simply hadn’t heard of these programs. Hadn’t heard of the abuse that regularly occurs there. Hadn’t heard of the death, abuse, and trauma that youth are subjected to.

This can no longer be assumed.

Thanks to the amazing work of Rep. George Miller the issue of abuse in the “troubled teen industry” has gotten national press exposure. Victims have had their day in the spotlight testifying in front of Congress. Several victims who I know personally were there to testify. And, to the media’s credit, they wrote stories about the bill and did pieces on the news about it. Yet compared to the coverage devoted to MySpace, video games and any other mythical dangers for our youth this coverage pales in comparison.

So my only thought left is that the main issue here is one of control. If kids are abused, killed, and traumatized for life under the watchful eye of parents or authority figures for their “own good” then society seems to be generally ok with that. Maybe the authority crossed a line, and maybe we should keep a closer eye on what goes on there, but generally nothing to get too upset over.

If, on the other hand, a young person is abused or kidnapped because of their own poor choices, well that’s simply the end of the world. They properly supervised. They weren’t properly controlled. This is the true crime and the true danger that society fears.

This isn’t to say that when left to their own devices youth don’t make bad decisions. They do. Sometimes those bad decisions have very serious consequences. But adults make many bad decisions themselves. Obviously responsible parents, teachers and mentors need to step in to avoid or mitigate the worst and most long lasting consequences that can befall their kids, but for everything else those mistakes and bad decisions are an important part of life. The beauty of bad decisions is that each and every one of them teaches an important lesson. An important lesson that leads to far more good decisions being made in the future.

When you are put in danger by someone else (as opposed to yourself) you don’t learn anything except fear and how to cope.

Misuse of authority is some how less threatening to people than misuse of freedom. While this is no doubt an issue that affects all levels of society and all institutions, it is particularly acute and troubling for youth. Thus we have hysteria over Grant Theft Auto 4 and a passing mention of teen torture camps.

But now is not the time for more doom & gloom worrying. Now is the time for action, now is the time for optomism. While the media and public at large may still be wandering in the wilderness, Congress at least has their head on straight. HR 5876 is the single best youth rights bill in Congress in years. NYRA activists, supporters, leaders and members must do absolutely everything in their power to pass this bill.

So please, please, please, please write your congressperson and tell them to vote YES on HR 5876 the Stop Child Abuse in Residential Programs for Teens Act of 2008.

McCain Not A Real Man, Says Limbaugh

June 6th, 2008

Interesting post by Jeffrey Feldman:

For playground-soldier Rush Limbaugh, when a Republican gives a speech that questions the effectiveness of government, that forfeits said Republican’s status as ‘a man.’ What would have earned McCain his ‘I’m a man’ badge? Blaming the destruction of New Orleans on liberals, of course (as if you had to ask).

But after reading that New Orleans speech by McCain–the one that has been widely ridiculed in the media since he delivered it on Tue–I noticed that McCain was actually trying to so something astounding. He was trying to use that speech (1) to bring Reagan-esque themes into the election and (2) to reframe this election as a referendum on ‘government,’ noit a referendum on ‘Bush’ (e.g., to undercut the Obama’ campaign’s framing strategy).

In reality, the Reaganism that McCain is trying to reclaim is no longer the core idea th guides the voice of American conservatism. Steered by right-wing pundits and fueled by hateful, violent rhetoric, contemporary conservatives no longer say that government is wasteful and inefficient. Instead, they say that liberalism kills, liberalism supports terrorism, liberalism will lead to the destruction of America.

No wonder McCain gets called a sissy by Limbaugh when he tries to channel Reagan rather than bash Bush–because Limbaugh has long since left the Reagan legacy behind in favor of the new violent rhetoric of the right.

And the irony does not stop there, because in all likelihood, Limbaugh’s bashing of McCain will bully him into conformity–will goad him into retooling his campaign into some kind of ‘liberals will kill you’ message. The paradox, of course, is that this will mean that an actual war veteran–who survived torture and still bears the scars of that experience on his body–will likely allow his manhood to be questioned by a drug addict who cross-dresses as a general and equates salivating on cigars with public service.

Rush Limbaugh, the quintessential military-dodging conservative coward, in other words, will humiliate the war veteran in this election.

I haven’t read the crux of Limbaugh’s complaints, but I watched McCain’s speech (and didn’t think it was nearly as bad as everyone is making it out to be) and definitely noticed the attempt at Reaganism with that line about New Orleans. How on earth can Limbaugh criticize him for that?

Maybe Feldman is right. The legacy of Reagan & the Gingrich revolution of ‘94 are totally lost now. Not that McCain is really the best champion for that legacy, but at least he tried. Who knows if he’ll keep at it now…

But the stylistic criticisms about McCain’s speech won’t ever really be addressed. I don’t have any issues with McCain’s speeches and I’ve watched a few. But put along side Obama, one of the most dynamic, exciting speakers we’ve had in politics in years, maybe decades, there is no chance for McCain to look anything other than old and lost.

Either way this’ll be a damn interesting election.

MADD Thinks Only Responsible Adults Should Drink & Drive

April 30th, 2008

MADD just sent out the following e-mail to their supporters. They want to give Grand Theft Auto (GTA) an adults only rating because it features the crime of drunk driving (apparently all the murder, car jacking and other crimes in it are just fine with MADD). “Drunk driving is not a game and not a joke” they say. Apparently only responsible adults should drink and drive. It isn’t appropriate for “youth”.

Oh wait, wasn’t MADD supposed to be opposed to drunk driving for *everyone*? So why then would the game’s rating matter? Why does MADD think it is somehow more acceptable for adults to drink and drive than youth?

Why also do they think limiting free speech is somehow an acceptable tactic in their anti-youth and anti-alcohol crusade?

MADD is encouraging their members to write the retailers below to pull GTA4 from shelves. You’d be surprized what a few pissed off complainers can accomplish. Don’t let MADD have the only say on this subject!

Write those same retailers and tell them that GTA is just a game and they shouldn’t stop selling it because a few mad mothers are upset over it. Write them and tell them to stand up for free speech.

MADD’s e-mail:

Each year nearly 13,500 people die in drunk driving crashes and
another half a million are injured in alcohol-related traffic crashes.
This is why MADD is extremely disappointed by the decision of the
manufacturers of the game Grand Theft Auto IV to include a game module
where players have to drive drunk.

Drunk driving is not a game and it is not a joke. Drunk driving is a
choice, a violent crime and it is also 100 percent preventable. MADD
is calling on the Entertainment Software Ratings Board to reclassify
Grand Theft Auto IV as an Adults Only game, a step up from the current
rating of Mature and for the manufacturer to consider a stop in
distribution if not out of responsibility to society then out of
respect for the millions of victims/survivors of drunk driving.

If you are concerned about the content of Grand Theft Auto IV, please
contact the retailers below and voice your opinion.

Amazon.com
206-266-1000
Online contact form
https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/contact-us/general-questions.html

Best Buy
612-291-1000
Online contact form
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?id=cat12104&type=page

Circuit City
804-527-4000
Online contact form
http://www.circuitcity.com/ccd/genericContent.do?oid=209855&c=1

EB Games and GameStop
817-424-2000
help@gamestop.com

Wal-Mart
479-273-4000
Online contact form
http://www.walmart.com/cservice/cu_commentsonline.gsp?cu_heading=8


MADD Thinks Only Responsible Adults Should Drink & Drive

Kid Given Hard Lemonade and a Foster Home

April 28th, 2008

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080428/COL04/804280375

If you watch much television, you’ve probably heard of a product called Mike’s Hard Lemonade.

And if you ask Christopher Ratte and his wife how they lost custody of their 7-year-old son, the short version is that nobody in the Ratte family watches much television.

The way police and child protection workers figure it, Ratte should have known that what a Comerica Park vendor handed over when Ratte ordered a lemonade for his boy three Saturdays ago contained alcohol, and Ratte’s ignorance justified placing young Leo in foster care until his dad got up to speed on the commercial beverage industry.

Even if, in hindsight, that decision seems a bit, um, idiotic.

Ratte is a tenured professor of classical archaeology at the University of Michigan, which means that, on a given day, he’s more likely to be excavating ancient burial sites in Turkey than watching “Dancing with the Stars” — or even the History Channel, for that matter.

The 47-year-old academic says he wasn’t even aware alcoholic lemonade existed when he and Leo stopped at a concession stand on the way to their seats in Section 114.

Clearly it was an honest mistake, everyone involved seems to recognize it except the ones who removed the kid from his parents. Even if it wasn’t a mistake, the kid didn’t seem to have any ill effects from the alcohol, tests didn’t even show any in his blood, so there was no danger. This is absurd.

Happened at Comerica Park too. :(

Lynchings in Congo as penis theft panic hits capital

April 25th, 2008

Hahahah.

KINSHASA (Reuters) - Police in Congo have arrested 13 suspected sorcerers accused of using black magic to steal or shrink men’s penises after a wave of panic and attempted lynchings triggered by the alleged witchcraft.

Reports of so-called penis snatching are not uncommon in West Africa, where belief in traditional religions and witchcraft remains widespread, and where ritual killings to obtain blood or body parts still occur.

Rumours of penis theft began circulating last week in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo’s sprawling capital of some 8 million inhabitants. They quickly dominated radio call-in shows, with listeners advised to beware of fellow passengers in communal taxis wearing gold rings.

Purported victims, 14 of whom were also detained by police, claimed that sorcerers simply touched them to make their genitals shrink or disappear, in what some residents said was an attempt to extort cash with the promise of a cure.

“You just have to be accused of that, and people come after you. We’ve had a number of attempted lynchings. … You see them covered in marks after being beaten,” Kinshasa’s police chief, Jean-Dieudonne Oleko, told Reuters on Tuesday.

Police arrested the accused sorcerers and their victims in an effort to avoid the sort of bloodshed seen in Ghana a decade ago, when 12 suspected penis snatchers were beaten to death by angry mobs. The 27 men have since been released.

“I’m tempted to say it’s one huge joke,” Oleko said.

“But when you try to tell the victims that their penises are still there, they tell you that it’s become tiny or that they’ve become impotent. To that I tell them, ‘How do you know if you haven’t gone home and tried it’,” he said.

Some Kinshasa residents accuse a separatist sect from nearby Bas-Congo province of being behind the witchcraft in revenge for a recent government crackdown on its members.

“It’s real. Just yesterday here, there was a man who was a victim. We saw. What was left was tiny,” said 29-year-old Alain Kalala, who sells phone credits near a Kinshasa police station.

Europe is Getting Taken Over! Oh No!

April 22nd, 2008

I came across a post on Apolyton from a Communist, Atheist, Slovakian who made a thread declaring himself to be Islamophobic and no longer ashamed of it. Points were raised about how Europe was gonna be a majority Muslim in 20 years, as is often said. Then the conversation turned to ask why the United States hasn’t had any issues with Islamic extremists. The reply was that we have lots of Christian extremists instead (which is a whole other level of BS but I didn’t address it). Someone rightly pointed out that the best equivalent to Europe’s Muslim “problem” is Blacks and other various races here.

I think that is a more accurate comparison. But things have changed a great deal in the last 40 years. Heck, we are likely to see a black president in the next year. So not only have we made tremendous progress over the last 40 years, the size of the “problem” we have here is larger than Europe.

Everyone talks all the time about how Muslims are “taking over” Europe. It is utter nonsense. Lets look at some numbers:

Muslims are 7% and 8% of the population in France, 5.8% in the Netherlands, 5% in Denmark, just over 4% in Switzerland and Austria, and almost 3 per cent in the United Kingdom.

If we use blacks, or even all non-whites, as our American equivalent the numbers are strikingly different.

In the United States blacks make up 12.2% of the population (much higher than any country in Europe). Plus Hispanics make up 14.8% of the population and Asians/Indians/Mixed/other are another 13.64%. So in total, non-whites are over 40% of our population.

Unlike the crazy predictions in Europe, it is far more likely and certain that in a few decades there will be a non-white majority. And the majority of us are ok with that.

Also, of that 60% white population we are still not nearly as homogeneous as individual European countries either. Italians, Germans, Brits, Russians, French and all the rest make up our white population. All sorts of different religions and demoninations too. That alone caused trouble in the past, but now we’ve totally gotten over it. Soon we’ll be entirely over the race thing too.

If France is having riots and predicting doom & gloom with 7 to 8% Muslim population, my advice is to get a fricken grip.

Or maybe all you elitist Eurocoms should stop and think for a moment about your conservative, bigoted, redneck, backwards cousins across the pond. Then perhaps you’ll realize that we have far more successfully, humanely, and comfortably stitched together a cosmopolitan and tolerant culture than Europe ever has or will. We certainly have had many problems along the way, but we’re stronger and better for it. Our nation didn’t come crashing down because of our diversity we became the world’s only super power.

So, in summary:

USA
Diversity
Muslims
Islamic radicals
Europe

Google is Pretty Smart

April 19th, 2008

First seen at Apolyton, this is a fairly perceptive bit of ad placement:

MADD’s Drinking Age Strategy (or lack thereof)

April 19th, 2008

Last night Instapundit picked up my appearance on Fox News a week or two ago:

SEVEN STATES THINKING OF LOWERING THE DRINKING AGE: They should. And the Federal government should get out of the business of trying to regulate state drinking ages, a subject of no legitimate federal concern whatsoever. it’s also telling that MADD wouldn’t even appear on camera to argue the other side.

Apparently TownHall.com picked it up too (which is where Glenn found it). It is great that he noticed MADD’s conspicuous absense from the piece. Apparently this is their new strategy, ignoring us in hopes that we’ll just go away.

It is a marked departure from their strategy this last fall when they considered this new push to lower the drinking age such a threat they created a coalition specifically to fight us (us being NYRA and Choose Responsibility). They held a press conference and announced their intention to fight to keep the drinking age where it is. It was an amazing tactical blunder.

With all the money, resources, clout and manpower they have, they felt threatened enough by us to go on the offensive. Of course it backfired horribly for them and ended up putting the issue of lowering the voting age into the press even more, giving us lots of free press. The media were surprised too, they couldn’t believe MADD would feel so threatened by this push to lower the drinking age that they’d start up this whole coalition to oppose us.

So now they’ve rethought their strategy and have been refusing to appear on any programs to discuss lowering the drinking age. After giving us tremendous credibility by opposing us directly they hope that they’ll deflate us by ignoring us. Sorry folks, the genie is out of the bottle now, this movement is not going away.

Gandhi had a great quote about this phenomena:

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.

MADD is doing things out of order. First they ridiculed us, then they fought us, and now they are ignoring us. One way or another, we are gonna win.

The evidence countinues to mount that the drinking age has been a failure and the denial of equal rights to young adults is too glaring an inconsistency for many Americans. The movement continues to grow, more and more people are becoming convinced that this is the right direction to move into.

MADD is more scared than they’ve been in a very long time.

Even though MADD itself refuses to debate us (because they know they’ll loose) their founder continues to open her big mouth in opposition to us (and in opposition to our troops as well). Hopefully Glenn will take notice of this comment by Candy Lightner on the Mike & Juliet Show.

Stefan had an excellent response to her comment. Also, Marty Beckerman wrote up a good reaction to it on Radar.Maybe MADD does have the right strategy. If their people (or former people) are going to get on national television and stupidly insult all of America’s armed forces (past and present) then it is probably best that they don’t show up to debate us. The more people realize how low their opinion is of Americans, our troops, and our youth, the more people will realize MADD is out of touch and completely wrong on this issue.

Go American Go!

March 16th, 2008