<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Holy Family &#038; Gay Marriage</title>
	<link>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/12/the_holy_family.html</link>
	<description>Alex's Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on The Holy Family &#038; Gay Marriage by: KPalicz</title>
		<link>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/12/the_holy_family.html#comment-379</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/12/the_holy_family.html#comment-379</guid>
					<description>I'm a little unclear what you're asking, but the official Catholic church position is that sex that isn't for procreation is a sin.  

So gay sex is a sin, but so is heterosexual sex using birth control.  Homosexuals aren't singled out at all or treated any different than anyone else.  Its the act that is a sin, not the person.

As for you second question...  are you asking why NYRA doesn't do anything specifically for gay youth?  Its because we work on the rights of ALL youth.  We recognize a common struggle among all young people.  To compartmentalize is to segregate.  To focus on gay youth excludes black youth.  To focus on black youth excludes female youth.  To focus on any one of these groups excludes the big picture, which is ALL youth.  

We hang together or we hang seperately.  

If you are implying that I am personally biased against gays and have used my position to stop NYRA from taking on a specific campaign about gay youth because of my bias, you couldn't be further off the mark.  I am a strong supporter of gay rights, I don't know where you would have gotten the impression I wasn't.  Furthermore, as I said above, segregating gay youth rights issues away from the rest of the youth rights issues hurts, not helps gay youth.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m a little unclear what you&#8217;re asking, but the official Catholic church position is that sex that isn&#8217;t for procreation is a sin.  </p>
	<p>So gay sex is a sin, but so is heterosexual sex using birth control.  Homosexuals aren&#8217;t singled out at all or treated any different than anyone else.  Its the act that is a sin, not the person.</p>
	<p>As for you second question&#8230;  are you asking why NYRA doesn&#8217;t do anything specifically for gay youth?  Its because we work on the rights of ALL youth.  We recognize a common struggle among all young people.  To compartmentalize is to segregate.  To focus on gay youth excludes black youth.  To focus on black youth excludes female youth.  To focus on any one of these groups excludes the big picture, which is ALL youth.  </p>
	<p>We hang together or we hang seperately.  </p>
	<p>If you are implying that I am personally biased against gays and have used my position to stop NYRA from taking on a specific campaign about gay youth because of my bias, you couldn&#8217;t be further off the mark.  I am a strong supporter of gay rights, I don&#8217;t know where you would have gotten the impression I wasn&#8217;t.  Furthermore, as I said above, segregating gay youth rights issues away from the rest of the youth rights issues hurts, not helps gay youth.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on The Holy Family &#038; Gay Marriage by: kat</title>
		<link>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/12/the_holy_family.html#comment-378</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/12/the_holy_family.html#comment-378</guid>
					<description>What's the official church position, Alex your position and Andrew Sullivan's position- not that I'm too concerned about AS's, I'm more interested in the person who defines in general NYRA position - -  it seems there's not much of a focus on the rights of gay youth?  What is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What&#8217;s the official church position, Alex your position and Andrew Sullivan&#8217;s position- not that I&#8217;m too concerned about AS&#8217;s, I&#8217;m more interested in the person who defines in general NYRA position - -  it seems there&#8217;s not much of a focus on the rights of gay youth?  What is that?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on The Holy Family &#038; Gay Marriage by: KPalicz</title>
		<link>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/12/the_holy_family.html#comment-377</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/12/the_holy_family.html#comment-377</guid>
					<description>Ah, I posted this before I left for California for a week so I didn't see your comment in time to act on that.  Oh well.  O'Reilly will miss out on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ah, I posted this before I left for California for a week so I didn&#8217;t see your comment in time to act on that.  Oh well.  O&#8217;Reilly will miss out on it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on The Holy Family &#038; Gay Marriage by: bigheadrob</title>
		<link>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/12/the_holy_family.html#comment-376</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/12/the_holy_family.html#comment-376</guid>
					<description>So, the most interesting analogy of the holiday, er, Christmas season goes to you, my friend.  Please send this post to FOX and see if O'Reilly will entertain your hypothesis.  Does anyone else think that Mary dressed lesbianish?  It may support Alex's claim...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>So, the most interesting analogy of the holiday, er, Christmas season goes to you, my friend.  Please send this post to FOX and see if O&#8217;Reilly will entertain your hypothesis.  Does anyone else think that Mary dressed lesbianish?  It may support Alex&#8217;s claim&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on The Holy Family &#038; Gay Marriage by: SciVille</title>
		<link>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/12/the_holy_family.html#comment-375</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/12/the_holy_family.html#comment-375</guid>
					<description>Well said! You rock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well said! You rock.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
