<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taboo and Morality Quiz</title>
	<link>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/07/taboo_and_moral.html</link>
	<description>Alex's Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Taboo and Morality Quiz by: Gwen</title>
		<link>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/07/taboo_and_moral.html#comment-218</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/07/taboo_and_moral.html#comment-218</guid>
					<description>I took the test. Not surprisingly, it said that I was very less interfering than normal. It also said that I was a hypocrite for saying that it's not morally wrong if no one is harmed, but then saying that I would be bothered in some instances. (Hey, I was just being honest. I WOULD be bothered for some of them; I can't really help it.) Interesting test, though.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I took the test. Not surprisingly, it said that I was very less interfering than normal. It also said that I was a hypocrite for saying that it&#8217;s not morally wrong if no one is harmed, but then saying that I would be bothered in some instances. (Hey, I was just being honest. I WOULD be bothered for some of them; I can&#8217;t really help it.) Interesting test, though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Taboo and Morality Quiz by: SciVille</title>
		<link>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/07/taboo_and_moral.html#comment-217</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/07/taboo_and_moral.html#comment-217</guid>
					<description>The more I think about it, that damn quiz served only to tease anyone who had any moral aversions to anything. Having morals is NOT a bad thing, which, sadly, some people don't seem to get, as they are so hell-bent on countering those with obvious, strong, overt morals, the kind that bore into the lives of others like a searing hot, unpleasant drill.

Anyway, more to the point, I don't think people who commit some of these hypotheticals should be imprisoned per se, or anything like that. But, you know, I'm still allowed to believe they shouldn't do it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The more I think about it, that damn quiz served only to tease anyone who had any moral aversions to anything. Having morals is NOT a bad thing, which, sadly, some people don&#8217;t seem to get, as they are so hell-bent on countering those with obvious, strong, overt morals, the kind that bore into the lives of others like a searing hot, unpleasant drill.</p>
	<p>Anyway, more to the point, I don&#8217;t think people who commit some of these hypotheticals should be imprisoned per se, or anything like that. But, you know, I&#8217;m still allowed to believe they shouldn&#8217;t do it!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Taboo and Morality Quiz by: Jess Caralize</title>
		<link>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/07/taboo_and_moral.html#comment-216</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/07/taboo_and_moral.html#comment-216</guid>
					<description>That quiz said that my moralising was all over the place. I tend to believe that if something is consensual or harmless to anyone else, it's not criminal or immoral, although I might find it disgusting. I'm a social libertarian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>That quiz said that my moralising was all over the place. I tend to believe that if something is consensual or harmless to anyone else, it&#8217;s not criminal or immoral, although I might find it disgusting. I&#8217;m a social libertarian.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
