<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Teen Brain Scans: A rebirth of Phrenology?</title>
	<link>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/02/teen_brain_scan.html</link>
	<description>Alex's Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Teen Brain Scans: A rebirth of Phrenology? by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/02/teen_brain_scan.html#comment-668</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/02/teen_brain_scan.html#comment-668</guid>
					<description>i tottally agree with the studies of the present scientist later</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>i tottally agree with the studies of the present scientist later
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Teen Brain Scans: A rebirth of Phrenology? by: Oblivion Dot Net</title>
		<link>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/02/teen_brain_scan.html#comment-24</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/02/teen_brain_scan.html#comment-24</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Teen Brain Scans: A rebirth of Phrenology?&lt;/strong&gt;

Matthew Yglesias brings up an article in the Washington Post yesterday that cites a new study that 'proves' the inferiority of teenage, and indeed early 20-year-old's brains. Apparently I am a danger to myself and others around me because of...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>Teen Brain Scans: A rebirth of Phrenology?</strong></p>
	<p>Matthew Yglesias brings up an article in the Washington Post yesterday that cites a new study that &#8216;proves&#8217; the inferiority of teenage, and indeed early 20-year-old&#8217;s brains. Apparently I am a danger to myself and others around me because of&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Teen Brain Scans: A rebirth of Phrenology? by: Yasha</title>
		<link>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/02/teen_brain_scan.html#comment-23</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/02/teen_brain_scan.html#comment-23</guid>
					<description>Yet another reason why the MSM needs to stop being our news and information gatekeeper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yet another reason why the MSM needs to stop being our news and information gatekeeper.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Teen Brain Scans: A rebirth of Phrenology? by: SciVille</title>
		<link>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/02/teen_brain_scan.html#comment-22</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/02/teen_brain_scan.html#comment-22</guid>
					<description>Not that I'm defending the researchers that much, but I do know the media tends to REALLY blow results or even hypotheses out of proportion. As you mentioned, Alex, for more sales. Notice there are no links to or mentions of the report for the research. It's possible the actual study is significantly different, with significantly different intentions, but the media don't want you knowing how the study really went. Just a thought. Great entry, Alex!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Not that I&#8217;m defending the researchers that much, but I do know the media tends to REALLY blow results or even hypotheses out of proportion. As you mentioned, Alex, for more sales. Notice there are no links to or mentions of the report for the research. It&#8217;s possible the actual study is significantly different, with significantly different intentions, but the media don&#8217;t want you knowing how the study really went. Just a thought. Great entry, Alex!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Teen Brain Scans: A rebirth of Phrenology? by: Demosthenes 337</title>
		<link>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/02/teen_brain_scan.html#comment-21</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/02/teen_brain_scan.html#comment-21</guid>
					<description>They only used 19 people for the study. clearly a huge margin of error present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>They only used 19 people for the study. clearly a huge margin of error present.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Teen Brain Scans: A rebirth of Phrenology? by: Yasha</title>
		<link>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/02/teen_brain_scan.html#comment-20</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://oneandfour.org/archives/2005/02/teen_brain_scan.html#comment-20</guid>
					<description>I'd like to know what Dr. Helen Smith's perspectives on these studies are. I'm going to email Insta an excerpt and link from this entry, along with that question for his wife. 

&lt;p&gt;Not all students of teen behavior, as she is, take such a junk science approach to the subject as found in this study. It's  critical that the sane voices be heard more from.&lt;/p&gt; 

&lt;p&gt;I'm glad you for one are stepping up to do your part. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;d like to know what Dr. Helen Smith&#8217;s perspectives on these studies are. I&#8217;m going to email Insta an excerpt and link from this entry, along with that question for his wife. </p>
	<p>Not all students of teen behavior, as she is, take such a junk science approach to the subject as found in this study. It&#8217;s  critical that the sane voices be heard more from.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m glad you for one are stepping up to do your part. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
