The problem here still remains the laws as they are right now. There is no reason a 15/16 year old should not be in a position to determine for themselves whether they want to stay at home or run off with someone they form a relationship with. As long as it is all consensual no charges should apply.

btw, thanks very much for stopping in on my blog. Great to have the actual people involved in the case come in to say their piece.

There are a great deal of other factors to take into consideration that they don’t have access to. The media in Washington State blew things way out of proportion, going as far as to indicate that he had binoculars and a telescope in his 8th floor apartment that overlooks the tennis courts od a local school. He had these items before living in that apartment and only got the telescope when his brother (that would be me) received one for Christmas - astronomy was one of the things we both enjoyed together.

The media is primarily concerned about sales and doesn’t always have the best intentions when it comes to the victim or anyone else except what may interest the reader/viewer. I too was shocked to read the comparison to the Unibomber, while I do feel the life and safety of a child is very important, I also don’t feel that Ayesha was in any real danger from my brother.

Ayesha was 15 when she was recovered and turned 16 the following day. Was she able to make a consentual decision, I would have to yes, but my opinion isn’t what matters, nor does the legal age of consent in Maryland or Washington since it has been transferred to Federal Court the age of 18 is what matters.

Acording to the lawyers he is looking at from 5 to 30 years with lifetime probation. A little bit on the severe side, but I guess a lot of that depends on what sort of plea bargain is made, whether he is mentally able to be charged, or many other factors. Regardless, I do know that he does need intensive mental health counseling.

It appears the article condone the idea that “minors”, like pets and slaves, are owned properties—objects, in other words. As if certain life forms have no free will—the price for the innocentization of children and youth.